Tesla (TSLA) is found to be compiled in a fatal autopilot crash, they have to pay up to $ 243 million (updated)
Tesla lost its case of the wrong death of the autopilot in Florida because the jury claims that the car manufacturer has paid victims of up to $ 243 million.
This is a significant blow to Tesla – although it is likely to appeal.
Update: This article has been updated to better explain the Amnt that Tesla has been paid.
Today we have informed about the closure of almost a monthly court and applicants for damages of $ 345 million.
Now the jury was returned to its judgment and found that Tesla partly Reirey (33%) for the accident and the plaintiffs of $ 129 million for damages and $ 200 million in repressive damages.
She likes $ 329 million, slightly less than the required Thanores, and Tesla has to pay only 33% of compensatory damage, as it has been found that 33% of the accident and repressive damage will be limited to 3x amental compensation compensation, $ 200 million.
However, it is still an important blow to Tesla and the main victory for those who have suffered from the advanced system assistance of Tesla (ADAS).
Brett Schreiber of Singleton Schreiber, the main representative for the applicant in this case, commented on the results:
Tesla proposed autopilot only for controlled access highways, but deliberate things that do not limit drivers to use it elsewhere, along with Elon Musk and said the world’s autopilot better than humans. Tesla’s lies turned our roads into trial tracks for their fundamentally defective technology, while the daily Americans like Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo hurt. Today’s verdict represents justice for the tragic death of Naibel and Dillon’s lifelong injuries that hold Tesla and Muska responsible for supporting a trillion dollars at the expense of human life.
The case is particularly impressive because the first case of incorrect death involving Tesla’s Adas Systems (Autopilot and Full of Self -drive) to achieve an attempt.
In recent months, Tesla has solved two similar cases for unpublished amants, but this could not settle in this.
In the case of Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo, Tesla is found partly responsible for misleading customers to think that autopilot can do more than he could.
George McGee managed the Hi Model S at the Key Largo in April 2019 when he dropped the phone and looked down to lift it as it fell apart around the stopwatch at the intersection, and crashed into the parked Chevrolet Tahoe.
Next to the parked Tahoe was 22 -year -old Naibel Benavides Leon and her Boyfrien Dillon Angulo. Benavids died and Angulo was serious.
Police accused McGee of ruthless proceedings, but the families of the victims sued McGee and Tesla. McGee settled with the plaintiffs, but Tesla did not – led to this court.
Tesla tried to put all the black on the driver, as he usually does with accidents involving his Adas system. This strategy generally worked due to Tesla’s warning that the driver is responsible.
At Lawyer, she said in her final argumens for the automaker:
It can happen in any, because? The race can. It happens in some because? The race is doing it.
Since the driver admitted that he did not pay attention, one could think that it would be an easy case; In this case, however, McGee’s comments led to Tesla’s demise.
The driver said about the autopilot:
My concept was that it would help me if I had a failure, or I should miss something if I made a mistake – that it could help me. And in the box I feel like I failed.
The lawyers used the driver’s testimony along with numerous statements by Tesla and his Elon Musk to prove how Tesla owners may be misleading in the belief that autopilot is more than a common driver assistance system.
Update: Tesla’s lawyers feel the following what verdict:
Today’s verdict is incorrect and only works to return car safety and endanger the efforts of Tesla and the whole industry to develop and implement life -saving technology. We plan to appeal with the substantial mistakes of the law and inconsistencies in court proceedings. Although this jury found that the driver was tremendously responsible for this tragic accident in 2019, the evidence has always shown that the driver was to blame because he spoke, with his foot on the accelerator – who overcame the autopilot – when he headed for his dropped phone without eyes on the road. To be clear, no car in 2019 and today would not prevent this accident. It was not an autopilot; It was the fiction created by lawyers of the prosecutors who blame the car when the driver – from the first day – admitted and accepted responsibility.
Electrek’s take
Now I am sure that Tesla will withdraw this process and extend as long as possible, but this is still a group sentence.
An important aspect to consider is that the prosecutors who could have circumvented Tesla accused drivers, which is always his defense against the Havábam Adas, and directly attacks Tesla known misleading approval to marketing autopilot and FSD.
I expect the litigation to be poured when this verdict was released.
It is also doing well for CA DMV, which also directly attacks Tel’s misleading presentation of the Autopilot and FSD.
FTC: We use Insure to earn automatic affiliate links. More.
